Hi John:
I think the idea before was to provide an acronym
list and also give each person or like minded
group a limit of a few pages in the FAQ document
in which to present a summary of their point of view.
Hal Ruhl
At 11:59 AM 2/7/2007, you wrote:
>Hal:
>you really believe that anybody could provide
>responses acceptable for all others? (I did not say understandable")
>Everybody sits in his own mindset and speaks his
>own scientific religion (=scientific belief
>system) - [said so, whether I aggraveted now (again) Russell or not.]
>We are in a pretty liquid exchange-state (liquid OM).
>Otherwise the idea is excellent, with multiple choice.
>John
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>Hal Ruhl
>To: <mailto:everything-list.domain.name.hidden>everything-list.domain.name.hidden
>Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:49 PM
>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds
>
>Hi John:
>
>Long ago there was some effort to write a FAQ
>for the list. Perhaps we should give it another try.
>
>Hal Ruhl
>
>
>
>
>At 11:30 AM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
>>Hal and list:
>>I do not think anybody "fully understands" what
>>other listers write, even if one thinks so.
>>Or is it only my handicap?
>>John M
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: <mailto:HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>Hal Ruhl
>>To:
>><mailto:everything-list.domain.name.hidden>everything-list.domain.name.hidden
>>Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:24 PM
>>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds
>>
>>Hi Bruno:
>>I do not think I fully understand what you are saying.
>>Suppose your model bans white rabbits from its
>>evolving universes - meaning I take it that all
>>successive states are fully logical consequences of their prior state.
>>I would see this as a selection of one possibility from two.
>>Lets us say that you are correct about this
>>result re your model, this just seems to
>>reinforce the idea that it is a sub set in order
>>to avoid the information generating selection in the full set.
>>Yours
>>Hal Ruhl
>>
>>At 11:30 AM 2/5/2007, you wrote:
>>
>> >Le 05-févr.-07, à 00:46, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
>> >
>> > > As far as I can tell from this, my model may include Bruno's model as
>> > > a subset.
>> >
>> >
>> >This means that even if "my theory" makes disappear all (1-person)
>> >white rabbits, you will still have to justify that your overset does
>> >not reintroduce new one.
>> >
>> >Bruno
>> >
>> >
>> > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>----------
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673
>- Release Date: 2/6/2007 5:52 PM
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Feb 07 2007 - 21:26:57 PST