Re: Searles' Fundamental Error

From: John M <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:15:41 -0500

By who's logic?
John M
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Torgny Tholerus
  To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
  Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 1:35 PM
  Subject: Re: Searles' Fundamental Error



  Brent Meeker skrev:
> Torgny Tholerus wrote:
>
>> Mark Peaty skrev:
>>
>>> And next: what do you mean by 'exist'?
>>>
>> 'Exist' is exactly the same as 'mathematical possibility'.
>>
>> Our Universe is a mathemathical possibility. That is why our Universe
>> exists. Every mathematically possible Universe exists in the same way.
>> But we can not get in touch with any of the other Universes, so from our
>> point of view does the other Universes not exist.
>>
> But what is "mathematical possibility"? Is it the same as "logically possible"? Does it rule out, "The book is green and the book is red."? Or does it only rule out, "The book is green and the book is not green."?
>
  Yes, it is the same as logically possible. One simple Universe is the
  Game of Life, with some starting configuration. This simple Universe
  exists in the same way as our Universe, even if nobody ever tries this
  starting configuration.

  --
  Torgny Tholerus


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Feb 07 2007 - 17:41:26 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST