Re: Rép : The Meaning of Life

From: John M <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:33:02 -0500

Or of comp, or of multiple universes, or of.....
(the list is almost unlimitable).
"Proving" is tricky. In many cases SOME accept the backwards argument from phenomena "assigned" to an originating assumption that is now deemed "proven" by it.
Some don't. It depends on evidence in one's personal belief system qualia (characteristics) if someone is not closed minded in his own belief system's 'monotheistic'
prejudices (like e.g. of natural sciences, or of math).

Has anybody proven the existence? (I mean beyond the Zenian question: "who's arthritis is it?")

John
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: 1Z
  To: Everything List
  Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:59 AM
  Subject: Re: Rép : The Meaning of Life




  Bruno Marchal wrote:

> Also, nobody has proved the existence of a primitive physical universe.

  Or of a Platonia



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Jan 23 2007 - 14:38:33 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST