Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>
> Tom Caylor writes (in response to Marvin Minsky):
>
>> Regarding Stathis' question to you about truth, your calling the idea
>> of believing unsound seems to imply that you are assuming that there is
>> no truth that we can discover. But on the other hand, if there is no
>> discoverable truth, then how can we know that something, like the
>> existence of freedom of will, is false?
>
> That's easy: it's logically impossible. When I make a decision, although
> I take all the evidence into account, and I know I am more likely to
> decide one way rather than another due to my past experiences and due to
> the way my brain works, ultimately I feel that I have the freedom to
> overcome these factors and decide "freely". But neither do I feel that
> this free decision will be something random: I'm not mentally tossing a
> coin, but choosing according to my beliefs and values. Do you see the
> contradiction here?
Yes, but it's a contrived contradiction. You have taken "free" to mean independent of you where "you" refers to your past experience, the way your brain works, etc. As Dennett says, that's not a free will worth having.
Brent Meeker
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Dec 27 2006 - 04:58:44 PST