Re: computer pain

From: John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:37:13 -0500

Brent:

Brent:
It seems your answer is that it's just a convention that you happen to have
learned - a mere artifact of culture as propounded by various
post-modernists.
JM:
In our culture and its predecessors primitive observations led to
explanations at the level of the then epistemic cognitive inventory, which
increases continually. Those simplistic ideas were retained and mended in
later 'science' of better learning epochs but the basis has not changed: a
"physical" view of "facts" and the way we still do value them as our
"reality." Composed into 'models' (groups) of their own.
If you call a newer look - based upon newer epistemic enrichment - as
"propounded by various post-modernists" - well, so be it, I don't consider
it pejorative.

Brent (on the "101"):
We are influenced by it because it has been very successful. I don't fly in
airplanes designed by alternative engineering. Unconventional ideas
interest me only in so far as they work as well or better than conventional
ones.
JM:
I think I hear a mix up of "the only one we have" for "the best one there
is". Your airplanes fall off the sky sometimes (spare me the statistics,
please, 1 is more than enough) contraceptives fail, houses burn down for
electric failures, there are wars in the conventionally based social
culture, our biosphere is going berserk because of our perfect scientific
applications, we have technology-related diseases, nuclear fall outs,
medical mishaps, politicians (oops) and food poisoning, bridge collapses and
other innumerable examples of safety failures of our '101'-based perfect
efficiency in this world. We live (and use) the ONLY one we have. Our
pretension lists the benefits and deems it the best. For the caveman the
BEST weapon was the hand-ax. For a priest the best science is HIS theology.
For a monotheist the best god is his god.
If you are not interested in the 'unconventional novelties' before they
prove to be superior then our ongoing ignorance, you will never get to them.
I go for it, not necessarily successful, but I try. And don't give up.
I don't believe that you want to stay put in the science-religion of our
axioms, emergence, 'givens', chaotic paradoxical beliefs and the
cosmologists' Big Bang narrative. And all the other marvels based on '101'.
Atoms, molecules, spin, energy, space, time, mass, gravitation, electricity,
light, life, mind, etc. just to name some.
They all are usable tools for some practical tasks as long as we have no
better ones
to use and explanation for them.
In the meantime have a happy new year

John M



On 12/23/06, Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
>
> John Mikes wrote:
> > Brent:
> > let me start at the end:
> > "So why don't you believe it?"
> > because I am prejudiced by the brainwashing I got in 101 science
> education,
> > the 'conventional' thinking of the (ongoing) science establishment -
> still
> > brainwashing the upcoming scientist-generations with the same '101' -
> > (which is also an answer to your 'conventional' quest:)
>
> It seems your answer is that it's just a convention that you happen to
> have learned - a mere artifact of culture as propounded by various
> post-modernists.
>
>
> > Unconventional is a lot on this list many of them to my liking
> (personal!)
> > and seemingly to yours, too.
> >
> > I leave it to the "conventional"(<G>) scientists to agree whether the
> Earth
> > is spherical (if it IS?) and used this example from the precedent texts
> > just
> > as an 'unconventional' variant thinking.
> > We (all, I suppose) are under a lot of influence from the 101 sciences
> and
> > my point was exactly to raise another possibility (absurd as it may be).
>
> We are influenced by it because it has been very successful. I don't fly
> in airplanes designed by alternative engineering. Unconventional ideas
> interest me only in so far as they work as well or better than conventional
> ones.
>
> Brent Meeker
> "They laughed at Bozo the Clown too."
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Dec 23 2006 - 18:37:30 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST