Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> Pete Carlton writes:
>
> > On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > > Then I am not sure if this is really related with Quentin Anciaux's
> > > idea that he feels located in his head.
> > > The idea that we are in our head ... is in our head!
> > >
> >
> > Another way of saying that, is that we have the urge to utter and
> > endorse sentences like "I feel located in my head" - but the
> > explanation of this urge is not necessarily "I am located in my head,
> > and I want to give an honest report of that". I'm not convinced that
> > there is a "1st person" fact of the matter whether "I" am in W or M.
>
> It's a strange thing, but we're not "really" located anywhere in the physical universe. We assume, probably correctly, that our consciousness-generating mechanisms are in our skulls receiving sensory input on the planet Earth, but we would have just the same experiences if our bodies were telepresence robots or if we were constructs in an appropriately configured virtual reality.
If we are probably located in our heads, we are probably *really*
located in our heads.
The claim "we're not "really" located anywhere in the physical
universe"
doesn't follow from "we cannot be completely certain we are located in
our heads"
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Dec 09 2006 - 10:15:42 PST