Re: UDA revisited

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:20:36 -0800

Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 21-nov.-06, à 00:27, Colin Geoffrey Hales a écrit :
>
> > Then what use is the UD?
>
>
>
> It is not a question of using it, it is that the UD is just there when
> you accept comp (and the minimal platonism to give sense to Church
> thesis).
The CT doesn't need ontological Platonism.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Nov 21 2006 - 09:22:48 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST