Re: Numbers, Machine and Father Ted

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:07:43 -0800

Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 11-nov.-06, à 01:09, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > No, because there are no possible worlds where (2^32582657)-1
> > is not a prime number.
>
> This is for me a typical "arithmetical realist" statement.
Most philosophers who use the "possible
worlds" terminology do nothing PW's actually
exist.
Of course it is AR in the sense of appealing to
mind-independent truth. And of course it
remains unclear whether your AR is a claim
about truth, or about existence.
> You still want it both ways: keeping comp and primary material reality,
> but I have already argued in detail that this cannot work in any
> reasonable way.
No you haven't. You argument requires an assumption of Platonism
as well as computationalism. Computationalism
alone is compatible with materialism.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Nov 11 2006 - 13:08:01 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST