Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> Peter Jones writes:
>
> > > > > Here is another thought experiment. You are watching an object moving against a
> > > > > stationary background at a velocity of 10 m/s. Suddenly, the object seems to instantly
> > > > > jump 10 metres in the direction of motion, and then continues as before at 10 m/s. You
> > > > > are informed that one of the following three events has taken place:
> > > > >
> > > > > (a) your consciousness was suspended for 1 second, as in an absence seizure;
> > > > >
> > > > > (b) you were scanned, annihilated, and a perfect copy created in your place 1 second
> > > > > later;
> > > > >
> > > > > (c) nothing unusual happened to you, but the object you were watching was instantly
> > > > > teleported 10 metres in the direction of motion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would you be able to guess which of the three events took place?
> > > > >
> > > > > Stathis Papaioannou
> > > >
> > > > Sure, it was (a). (c) violates the laws of physics. (b) might or might not be theoretically possible, but it's practically impossible.
> > >
> > > OK, you would probably be right if you were kidnapped and subjected to this experiment
> > > tomorrow. But it's a thought experiment, and my point is that from your conscious
> > > experience alone you would be unable to distinguish between the three cases. Peter Jones'
> > > posts seem to imply that you would notice a difference.
> >
> > You have to say that, given a particular theory of consciousness,
> > would you notice a difference. If physical counterfactuals/causality
> > is important, you could in cases a) and b), since they
> > all involve an abnormal causal transition from one OM to
> > then next. Given computationalism, it is less straightforward.
>
> The question is independent of your theory of consciousness. Say consciousness
> is based on process C. I trust you will assume that process C is entirely physical, but
> suppose it involves God animating your brain with his breath. Then in case (a) God stops
> breathing for a second, in case (b) God destroys you and makes a perfect copy which he
> reanimates a second later, and case (c) is unchanged. The important point is, when you
> are destroyed then rebuilt, the new version of you is perfectly identical to the original and
> functions exactly the same as the original would have. It seems to me *logically* impossible
> that you could distinguish between the three cases.
Assuming that everything necessary for consciousness at time can be
contained
in a 0-duration snapshot at time t. However, If consciousness
supervenes on a process,
however that assumption is not true.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 18:16:26 PST