Re: Numbers, Machine and Father Ted

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:18:24 +0100

Le 26-oct.-06, à 23:35, 1Z a écrit :


> Mathematical logic can't conjure up existential conclusions
> without making existential assumptions.



If Aristotle was right on the question of the existence of some
physical or natural *primary* matter, then indeed mathematical logic
wouldn't conjure up its existence.

Actually, as I have just said, mathematical logic cannot even conjure
up the existence of numbers.

That is why I explicitly assume the existence of numbers, through RA or
PA axioms when I interview the machine, or by accepting the independent
truth of arithmetical statements, like in UDA.

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 06:18:44 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST