George Levy wrote:
>Russell, you have made an interesting point. You have separated the concept
>of plenitude from the MWI. According to you, the MWI is only a subset of the
>Plenitude. I am not sure if I agree with this but the point is well taken. I
>certainly think that the MWI is a manifestation of the plenitude. Why should
>the MWI be of lesser size than the Plenitude? I don't have an answer for
>this.
IF comp is correct, and IF QM is correct, then the MWI's infinite
histories
have to be shown of measure one among the (a priori bigger) set of the
infinite computational histories.
Bruno
Received on Mon Aug 30 1999 - 02:01:43 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST