Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:42:07 -0700

Colin Hales wrote:
...

>> As far as the internal life of the CPU is
>>
>>concerned...
>>
>>>whatever it is like to be an electrically noisy hot rock, regardless of
>>
>>the
>>
>>>program....although the character of the noise may alter with different
>>>programs!
>>
>
>>That's like say whatever it is like to be you, it is at best some waves of
>>chemical
>>potential. You don't *know* that the control system is not conscious -
>>unless you
>>know what structure or function makes a system conscious.
>>
>
>
> There is nothing there except wires and electrically noisy hot rocks,
> plastic and other materials = <stuff>.

Just like me. Nothing but proteins and osmotic potentials and ACT and ADP = <stuff>.

>Whatever its consciousness is... it
> is the consciousness of the <stuff>. The function

Which function?

> is an epiphenomenon at the
> scale of a human user

Who's the user of my brain?

Brent Meeker

>that has nothing to do with the experiential qualities
> of being the computer.

What are the experiential qualities of being a computer? and how can we know them?

Brent Meeker

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Sep 12 2006 - 23:43:06 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST