SV: SV: computationalism and supervenience

From: Lennart Nilsson <lennartn.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:55:29 +0200

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
[mailto:everything-list.domain.name.hidden] För Brent Meeker
Skickat: den 11 september 2006 08:44
Till: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
Ämne: Re: SV: computationalism and supervenience


Lennart Nilsson wrote:
...
> But my point is that this may come down to what we would mean by a
computer
> being
> conscious. Bruno has an answer in terms of what the computer can prove.
> Jaynes (and
> probably John McCarthy) would say a computer is conscious if it creates a
> narrative
> of its experience which it can access as memory.
>
> Brent Meeker
>
> Humphrey says it has to have an evolutionary past.
> LN

I've read some of Humphrey's books, but I don't recall that. What's his
argument?
Whats the citation?

Brent Meeker

His book "Seeing red" is based on lectures he gave at Harvard University
2004. What makes Humphrey´s theory special is that he thinks sensation is a
side show separated from perception. Dennett has also somewhat come around
to this view. He says in "It´s Not a Bug, It´s a Feature" in Journal of
Consciousness Studies 7 (2000): "Humphrey has convinced me that something
like his distinction between visual sensation and visual perception must be
drawn".

Why would evolution create a side show and not just perception? What is it
for? asks Humphrey. He has been studying cases of blindsight and found that
although they have perception THEY DON´T CARE. The creation of a side show
is what having a sensation is, concludes Humphrey, and when sensation is
absent the subject thinks of him/herself as less of a Self.

Humphey thinks that sensation and perception from a common beginning take
relatively independent paths in evolution. Sensations in this view are
descendents of a kind of activity which once upon a time actually was a kind
of bodily expression but "nowadays is virtual, privatixed, adressed to an
as-if body; but there is every reason to suppose that its characteristics -
its dimensions - have remained in line with what they were". He further
notes that "the experience of creating a sensation has many of the
characteristics of creating a bodily expression".

LN



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Sep 11 2006 - 07:56:35 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST