Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: 1Z <>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:22:39 -0700

Brent Meeker wrote:

> That interpretation can be reduced to computation is implicit in computationalism.

The problem is that if you think all computation must be reduced to
**as well**, you get circularity.

> The question is what, if anything, is unique about those computations that execute
> interpretation.

yes, for people who want to understand the mind computationally.
But it doesn't lead to everythingism.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 19:23:36 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST