Brent Meeker wrote:
> That interpretation can be reduced to computation is implicit in computationalism.
The problem is that if you think all computation must be reduced to
interpretation
**as well**, you get circularity.
> The question is what, if anything, is unique about those computations that execute
> interpretation.
yes, for people who want to understand the mind computationally.
But it doesn't lead to everythingism.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 19:23:36 PDT