Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:28:32 -0700

Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> Le jeudi 7 septembre 2006 14:14, 1Z a écrit :
> > Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > > Le 06-sept.-06, à 21:59, 1Z a écrit :
> > > > Of course it is not natural, or we would not
> > > > have two separate words for "possible" and "actual".
> > >
> > > Well, Platonist theories are counter-intuitive. Aristotle is the one
> > > responsible to make us believe reality is what we measure. Plato says
> > > what we observe is the shadow of what is.
> >
> > yet metaphysics is a *bad* thing...
>
> Why the hell metaphysics is a bad thing ?

Ask Bruno.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Sep 08 2006 - 07:30:50 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST