Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 22-août-06, à 18:36, 1Z a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> > Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> >> I can agree. No physicist posit matter in a fundamental theory.
> >
> > All physical theories are theories of matter (mass/energy).
>
> I believe so. This does not entail per se that matter is primitive.
A philosophical notion of pimitive matter is both
constent and useful.
> Also I prefer to define physics by the science of the observables.
It isn't, de facto. "Machian" physics is a side-issue
or minority interest, like intuitionism in maths.
> It
> is more neutral and misleading than by using the notion of matter,
> which is so different when considered along Plato line or Aristotle
> one.
People have come up with different theories
about the same thing ?!
Next, you'll be telling me there is more than one
philosophy-of-maths...so obviously maths must be dicarded wholesale ,
to avoid confusion.
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Aug 23 2006 - 10:12:36 PDT