Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 18-août-06, à 17:02, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > It is for Pythagorenas and Platonists to explain what they mean by
> > "exist".
> >
> > However, if you are going to claim that we are actually *in* Platonia,
> > (mathematical monism) there must be some equivalence between the
> > existence we
> > have and the existence numbers have.
>
>
>
> Of course! But that is what I am currently explaining. If you have
> follow the UDA, then, even if you could not yet be completely convinced
> by each steps, you should at least be able to figure out in which sense
> "you", here and now, in the "shape" of an OM, to borrow the list
> vocabulary, exist as a relative number.
I cna't be persuaded of that without first being
persuaded that numbers exist.
> Third personally you exist in
> aleph-zero relative number form (like snapshots of a running program).
> First personally you exist in the same shape (although you cannot know
> that) but you are "multiplied" by a continuum: the computational
> histories generated by the UD, in the mathematical sense, going through
> those third person states.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Aug 19 2006 - 09:31:27 PDT