Re: Can we ever know truth?

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:22:45 -0700

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>
>
>
> John M writes:
>
>
>>When did you last learn that the tenets of ongoing
>>physics are only "provisionally" accepted as 'real'?
>>(I just wanted to tease members of this list.
>>Of course on THIS list 'thinking' people gathered and
>>such thoughts are not unusual. We are the exception.)
>>
>>An example is the Big Bang. Many scientists almost put
>>it into their evening prayer. Doubting is heresy.
>>This is why I scrutinize what we 'believe in' and try
>>alternate narratives: do they hold water? Are the new
>>(alternate) ideas palatable to what (we think) we
>>experience?
>
>
> I'm sure all the Big Bang theorists would say that they would
> change their views if new evidence came to light. Of course,
> there are thousands of ideas out there and most of them are
> pretty crazy, pushed by people who don't understand even
> the basics of what they are criticising, so it is understandable
> that these ideas would sometimes be dismissed out of hand by
> people working in the field. It is also undestandable that
> scientists are only human and get quite attached to the theories
> on which they base their careers, so they may not change as
> quickly as they ought to in the light of new evidence.
>
> Stathis Papaioannou

In fact there are serious theories of the universe in which there is no
originating big bang. For example Paul Steinhardt has published papers on a
model in which the universe we see is one of two 3-branes in a
10-dimensional space.

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403020

The origin of particles and energy and their flying apart as we see them is
due to collision of our 3-brane with the other 3-brane. He shows that this
can be a cyclic process in which the universe empties out due to expansion
and then another collision can occur. While a few individual scientists may
consider the big bang origin of the universe dogma, every scientist working
in a field like cosmogony wants to make his name by showing that current
theories are wrong.

Brent Meeker

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Aug 14 2006 - 03:25:55 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST