Re: Difficulties in communication. . .

From: 1Z <>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:02:33 -0000

Brent Meeker wrote:

> That brings us back to Descartes "I think therefore I am"; which Russell
> pointed out was an unsupported inference. The most that could be said is,
> "There's thinking." If your ontology includes processes like "thinking"
> then I suppose it does precede your empistemology. But you can't kick
> thinking and if you could it wouldn't kick back - unless the ESPers are
> right. ;-)

I don't want my ontology to precede my epistemology. I think
both claims are silly.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sun Aug 13 2006 - 19:04:35 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST