RE: Bruno's argument - Comp

From: W. C. <cccwalter.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:58:41 +0800

>From: Quentin Anciaux
>
>Hi, I've checked and I do not see an absolute meaning to perfection.
>

OK. If you want more, I will say perfection in PU is *every being is perfect
and feels perfect (if it has feeling)*.
This doesn't mean that every being is exactly the same. They may have
different special functions. But they are all perfect.
They are born with highest self-fulfillment and happiness (if needed) and
all resources, no need to follow life cycles
(born, aged, sick, death etc.).
So a PU is without any wars/crimes/conflicts, any bad things, any natural
disasters ... etc.
If you want even more, I think I need to write down some math.
formulas/theorems etc. But it takes time.

Thanks.

WC.

_________________________________________________________________
Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE!
http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Aug 05 2006 - 19:00:48 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST