RE: Bruno's argument - Comp

From: W. C. <cccwalter.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:12:45 +0800

Good question. But I don't think we need to define "perfect".
You can check the dictionary to know its meaning.
Your killing example won't exist in the PU. Otherwise it won't be PU.

>From: everything-list.domain.name.hidden The problem with perfection is that
>this word has *no* absolute meaning.
>
>Then depending on your culture/history it can have a different meaning.
>
>Stupid example: Imagine you are a serial killer... perfect world for you
>would be a world were you can kill at will ;) But you would say that a
>serial killer cannot be in a perfect world (I'd say he cannot be in your
>perfect world, not his).
>
>So unless there exists an absolute meaning of perfection, PU seems
>impossible or I should say meaningless.
>
>Quentin

_________________________________________________________________
No masks required! Use MSN Messenger to chat with friends and family.
http://go.msnserver.com/HK/25382.asp


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Aug 05 2006 - 07:14:49 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST