RE: Bruno's argument - Comp

From: W. C. <>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:12:45 +0800

Good question. But I don't think we need to define "perfect".
You can check the dictionary to know its meaning.
Your killing example won't exist in the PU. Otherwise it won't be PU.

>From: The problem with perfection is that
>this word has *no* absolute meaning.
>Then depending on your culture/history it can have a different meaning.
>Stupid example: Imagine you are a serial killer... perfect world for you
>would be a world were you can kill at will ;) But you would say that a
>serial killer cannot be in a perfect world (I'd say he cannot be in your
>perfect world, not his).
>So unless there exists an absolute meaning of perfection, PU seems
>impossible or I should say meaningless.

No masks required! Use MSN Messenger to chat with friends and family.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sat Aug 05 2006 - 07:14:49 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST