RE: Bruno's argument

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathispapaioannou.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:26:31 +1000

Brent Meeker writes:

> Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> > Peter Jones writes (quoting SP):
> >
> >
> >>> The constraints (a) and (b) you mention are ad hoc and an
> >>> unnecessary complication. Suppose Klingon computers change their
> >>> internal code every clock cycle according to the well-documented
> >>> radioactive decay pattern of a sacred stone 2000 years ago. If we
> >>> got our hands on one of these computers and monitored its
> >>> internal states it would seem completely random; but if we had
> >>> the Klingon manual, we would see that the computer was actually
> >>> multiplying two numbers, or implementing a Klingon AI, or
> >>> whatever. Would you say that these computations were not valid
> >>> because it's a dumb way to design a computer?
> >>
> >> I'd say that a defintion of "computer" that applies to everything
> >> is useless.
> >
> >
> > I agree, it's completely useless to *us* because we couldn't interact
> > with it. That would be the end of the matter unless we say that
> > computation can lead to consciousness, creating as it were its own
> > observer. Are you prepared to argue that the aforementioned Klingon
> > AI suddenly stops being conscious when the last copy of the manual
> > which would allow us to interact with it is destroyed?
>
> If it's intelligent we should be able to interact with it without a manual.

I should have specified, there is no input or output device connected. With
a "normal" computer we might look for patterns in its internal states and
design drivers for a keyboard and monitor, but with this computer its
internal states are apparently completely random unless you have the
original design specifications.

Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Jul 30 2006 - 02:28:32 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST