- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Devin Harris <harrisdev.domain.name.hidden>

Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:36:22 -0700

Bruno Marchal wrote:

*> My answer was that I don't see how Tegmark can make this challenge
*

*> effective because the collection of mathematical structures is
*

*> not definable in mathematical terms.
*

The point could be that there is no collection of mathematical

structures that are not definable in mathematical terms. All

mathematical structures necessarily have in common an existence.

Existence is fundamental. There is no middle ground or alternative.

Systems don't partially exist because there is no other state. There

isn't even a choice between existing or not existing. Non-existence by

definition cannot be. There is no such thing; no meaning to the

anomalous idea that something doesn't exist. There is no such

alternative. There is only being. That existence becomes what we think

of as a mathematical system and all mathematical structures are subsets

of the one elementary math. Consequently it is wrong to imagine two

mathematical structures that have no relationship to one another or

somehow form realities that are ultimately incompatible and

irreconcilable. This is to say, there is, always has been, and always

will be, a universe. And there is no place the universe is not.

Received on Sun Jul 11 1999 - 13:38:46 PDT

Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:36:22 -0700

Bruno Marchal wrote:

The point could be that there is no collection of mathematical

structures that are not definable in mathematical terms. All

mathematical structures necessarily have in common an existence.

Existence is fundamental. There is no middle ground or alternative.

Systems don't partially exist because there is no other state. There

isn't even a choice between existing or not existing. Non-existence by

definition cannot be. There is no such thing; no meaning to the

anomalous idea that something doesn't exist. There is no such

alternative. There is only being. That existence becomes what we think

of as a mathematical system and all mathematical structures are subsets

of the one elementary math. Consequently it is wrong to imagine two

mathematical structures that have no relationship to one another or

somehow form realities that are ultimately incompatible and

irreconcilable. This is to say, there is, always has been, and always

will be, a universe. And there is no place the universe is not.

Received on Sun Jul 11 1999 - 13:38:46 PDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST
*