On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Higgo James wrote:
> Being symathetic to Buddhist philosophy, I deny absolutely that ther *is*
> such a thing as a well defined 'me'. All I am interested in is the 'flow'
> of consciousness. I see no reason why this should ever be 'interrupted'.
Is that supposed to be your reply to yet another of my long and
detailed explanations on measure? You didn't explain anything.
James, until you learn how to put together an argument, what's the
point? And learn to spell while you're at it - starting with my name
which is not Jaques.
Other q-suiciders are welcome to respond to my last post on
measure.
- - - - - - -
Jacques Mallah (jqm1584.domain.name.hidden)
Graduate Student / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
My URL:
http://pages.nyu.edu/~jqm1584/
Received on Tue Dec 29 1998 - 10:54:04 PST