Re: Doomsday Argument (was: a baysian solution)

From: Nick Bostrom <bostrom.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 01:53:02 +0000

Wei wrote:

> I don't understand your reasoning then.
snip
> Something strange is going on here, but I don't know what. If I'm right,
> everyone in this scenario should believe the universe is equally likely to
> be type A as type B and then change his mind after learning his name. A
> simple Dutch book argument suggests this is irrational

Yes, that is exactly my point. If you see how the hypothetical
reasoning I gave leads to this absurdity, then you have seen the
reductio, and I might not need to try to explain it in more detail?

>, but as far as I
> can see the probability computations are correct. May I'm missing
> something obvious.

Yes: that it is not rational to consider one's name a random sample
from the set of all possible names.Once this is realized, the
absurd conclusion won't follow.

_____________________________________________________
Nick Bostrom
Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
London School of Economics
n.bostrom.domain.name.hidden
http://www.hedweb.com/nickb
Received on Thu Apr 23 1998 - 18:12:09 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST