WD:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 1998 at 05:46:41PM +1000, Mitchell Porter wrote:
> > So I stand by my original claim: the many-worlds interpretation
> > has not been clearly enunciated. Crucial concepts remain undefined
> > in any rigorous way.
>
> Ok, let me give my understanding of what a "world" is in MWI. Suppose we
> take the UWF and consider it as the superposition of two wavefunctions:
>
> PSI = c_0 PSI_0 + c_1 PSI_1.
>
> If from examining the time evolution of PSI, we can tell that there is
> very little interference between PSI_0 and PSI_1 after time t_1,
Can you define what "interference" means here?
-mitch
http://www.thehub.com.au/~mitch
Received on Thu Feb 19 1998 - 20:50:25 PST